delo diplomskega seminarja
Povzetek
V strokovni literaturi najdemo različne opredelitve prevar, neenotni so predvsem pri
opredelitvi in pojmovanju korupcije. V anglo-ameriški literaturi je korupcija del razvejane
opredelitve prevar, medtem ko je v domači literaturi to ločeno. Gre za negativne pojavne
oblike v gospodarskem, političnem in zasebnem ţivljenju. Zmanjšujejo zaupanje, ugled,
pravičnost, uspešnost gospodarskega sistema in drţavnih organov. Najmanj prevar in
korupcije je po raziskovanju ACFE v najbolj razvitih drţavah, kot so Finska, Švedska,
Norveška, Švica, Avstralija, medtem so v najrevnejših drţavah prevare in korupcija najbolj
razširjene.
V raziskavi Indeks zaznavanja korupcije, ki jo izvaja Transparency International (TI), je
Slovenija uvrščena sorazmerno dobro ali celo zelo dobro. V letu 1999 je bila Slovenija v
raziskavo vključena prvič in je dosegla rezultat 6,0 ter se uvrstila na 25. mesto. V zadnjem
merjenju leta 2010 je ocena korupcije 6,4. Rezultat je zadovoljiv - predvsem v svetovnem
merilu, medtem ko se med drţavami EU-27 nahajamo nekoliko pod povprečjem.
Ugotavljamo, da v Republiki Sloveniji izdajajo poročila o prevarah le vladne institucije, ni
pa drugih raziskav, ki bi beleţile tudi primere prevar, ki jih organi pregona niso
obravnavali.
Organe odkrivanja prevar lahko razdelimo na tiste, ki delujejo zunaj podjetja na drţavni
ravni in organe, ki delujejo znotraj podjetja. Kljub vsem institucijam, ki raziskujejo
prevare, te ne dosegajo ţelene stopnje zatiranja in odkrivanja.
Kot pomanjkljivost izpostavljamo izobraţevalni sistem, saj v študijskih programih
podjetništva ni predmetnika, ki bi vseboval problematiko, postopke odkrivanja in
preprečevanja prevar. S tem bi zagotovili, da diplomanti:
- razumejo tveganje nastanka prevar,
- znajo oblikovati strategijo preprečevanja in odkrivanja prevar,
- znajo ovrednotiti stroške izgub, če kontrole opustimo,
- znajo vzpostaviti učinkovite kontrole odkrivanja prevar,
- v podjetju znajo vzpostaviti kulturo, da so kontrole potrebne.
V nobeni študiji o prenehanju podjetniške dejavnosti ni preučevan vpliv prevar na
prenehanje podjetniške dejavnosti, zato smo si zadali nalogo, da preučimo, ali so prevare
pomemben razlog prenehanja podjetniške dejavnosti. Na osnovi odgovorov stečajnih
upraviteljev lahko povzamemo:
1. da so bile prevare zaznane v 86,9 % odgovorov;
2. 65,2 % prevar je bilo ugotovljenih v stečajnem postopku, le 34,8 % pred stečajnim
postopkom;
3. najpogostejša povzročitelja prevar sta management in lastniki, deleţ prevar, ki so
jih povzročili zaposleni je zanemarljiv;
4. neupravičeno pridobljena denarna in nedenarna sredstva so najpogostejša vrsta
prevar, sledita ji prevarantsko poročanje ter korupcija;
5. stečajni upravitelji oziroma upraviteljice so prepoznali, da je velika ţelja po osebni
koristi najpogostejši razlog prevar. Sledi vedenje prebrisanega poslovneţa,
manjkajoča likvidnost, ţivljenje preko lastnih zmoţnosti in ţelja po financiranju;
6. stečajni upravitelji oziroma upraviteljice ugotavljajo, da so prevare v 69 %
povzročile stečaj. Samo 31 % prevar ni imelo pomembnega vpliva na delovanje
podjetja;
7. 69 % stečajnih upraviteljev pri odkrivanju prevar ne uporablja posebnih postopkov;
8. stečajni upravitelji oziroma upraviteljice pri odkrivanju prevar najpogosteje
sodelujejo s sodiščem in policijo, manj pa z davčno upravo, kot drugo so navedli
sodelovanje z ekonomskim izvedencem;
9. 85 % odgovorov potrjuje potrebo po preiskovalcu prevar po zgledu ZDA;
10. najpogosteje so prevare zaznane v proizvodni dejavnosti (40 %), sledi storitvena
dejavnost (30 %), trgovina (25 %) in finančna dejavnost (5 %);
11. največ prevar je ugotovljenih v srednje velikih podjetjih (45%), sledijo mikro
podjetja (25 %), mala podjetja (25 %), v velikih podjetjih je najmanj prevar (5 %);
12. 85% prevar je bilo povzročenih v druţbah z omejeno odgovornostjo (d.o.o.) in
15 % v delniških druţbah (d.d.).
Ključne besede
podjetništvo;prevare;gospodarski kriminal;korupcija;krize;nadzor;
Podatki
Jezik: |
Slovenski jezik |
Leto izida: |
2011 |
Izvor: |
Maribor |
Tipologija: |
2.11 - Diplomsko delo |
Organizacija: |
UM EPF - Ekonomsko-poslovna fakulteta |
Založnik: |
[E. Čokelc] |
UDK: |
657.6:343.53 |
COBISS: |
10885916
|
Št. ogledov: |
1779 |
Št. prenosov: |
294 |
Ocena: |
0 (0 glasov) |
Metapodatki: |
|
Ostali podatki
Sekundarni jezik: |
Angleški jezik |
Sekundarni naslov: |
Corporate fraud |
Sekundarni povzetek: |
In the proffesional literature we find different definitions of fraud, especially mixed in the
case definition and perception of corruption. In the Anglo-American literature, corruption
is widespread definition of fraud, while in the domestic literature that separate. There are
negative manifestations of the economic, political and personal life. Reduces trust,
reputation, fairness, effectiveness of economic system and state authorities. On the basis of
ACFE research, the least of fraud and corruption is in most developed countries such as
Finland, Sweden, Norway, Switzerland, Australia, while the fraud and corruption are most
widespread in the poorest countries.
The survey Corruption perception index conducted by the Transparency International (TI),
Slovenia ranks relatively well, or even very good. In 1999 Slovenia was included in the
survey for the first time, and achieved the result of 6.0 and ranked 25th place. In the last
measurement in 2010the result is 6.4. The result is satisfactory - especially on a global
scale, while we are located between slightly below average from the countries of EU-27.
We note that in the Republic of Slovenia only goverment institution issued reports of
fraud, while there is no other research, which also recorded cases of fraud that were not
addressed by law enforcement authorities.
Authorities that detects fraud can be divided into those that operate outside the enterprise at
the national level authorities and those authorizies acting within the company. Despite all
the institutions that investigate fraud, they do not achieve the desired level of suppression
and detection.
As a deficieny we highlight the educational system, since in the academic program of
entrepreneurship there is no the curriculum, which includes issues, procedures for
detecting and preventing fraud. This ensures that graduates:
- understand the risk of fraud,
- are able to develop a strategy to prevent and detect fraud,
- are able to evaluate the cost of any losses incurred if you let go of control,
- are able to establish effective controls to detect fraud,
- know how to create a culture in a company that controls are necessary.
In any study about the termination of business activity is not studied the impact of fraud on
the cessation of business activities. Therefore we have set ourselves the task to investigate
whether fraud are important reason for the termination of business activity. Based on
responses liquidators can be summarized as follows:
1. fraud have been detected in 86.98 % of responses,
2. 65.2 % of fraud were detected in bankruptcy, only 34.8 % before the bankruptcy
proceedings,
3. the most common causes of fraud management and owners, the proportion of fraud
caused by employees is negligible,
4. improperly obtained financial and non-monetary assets are the most common,
followed by reporting fraudulent and corrupt practices,
48
5. bankruptcy administrator have recognized that a great desire for personal benefit
most common cause of fraud. Behavior follows the clever businessman, lack of
liquidity, living through their own abilities and fiance desires,
6. bankruptcy administrator determined that the fraud resulted in 69 % of bankruptcy.
Only 31 % of fraud had no significant effect on bankruptcy.
7. 69 % of the bankuptcy administrators in detecting fraud use special procedures.
8. in detecting fraud bankruptcy administrator usually participate with the court and
the police, less with the tax administration. Second, they indicated the participation
of economic experts.
9. 85 % of the responses confirmed the need for a fraud investigator, following the
example the U.S.
10. tte most commonly detected fraud are in production activities (40 %), followed by
the service industry (30 %), trade (25 %) and financial activities (5 %).
11. The most of fraud is in medium-sized enterprises (45 %), followed by micro firms
(25 %), small businesses (25 %) and least in large companies (5 %).
12. 85 % of fraud was caused by limited liability companies (LLC) and 15 % i |
Sekundarne ključne besede: |
Corporate fraud;corporate crime;fraud;business environment;corruption;Corporate fraud
in times of crisis;business fraud in bankruptcy proceedings.; |
URN: |
URN:SI:UM: |
Vrsta dela (COBISS): |
Delo diplomskega seminarja/zaključno seminarsko delo/naloga |
Komentar na gradivo: |
Univ. v Mariboru, Ekonomsko-poslovna fak. |
Strani: |
55 str. |
Ključne besede (UDK): |
applied sciences;medicine;technology;uporabne znanosti;medicina;tehnika;communication and transport industries;accountancy;business management;public relations;komunikacije in transport;knjigovodstvo;poslovni menedžment;stiki z javnostjo;accountancy;računovodstvo;social sciences;družbene vede;law;jurisprudence;pravo;pravoznanstvo;criminal law;penal offences;kazensko pravo;kazniva dejanja;offences against public credit;morality;the family; |
ID: |
1015273 |