magistrsko delo
Povzetek
Med največjimi problemi, s katerimi se srečuje današnja družba, sta nedvomno terorizem in organiziran kriminal v povezavi s korupcijo. Ker ta dva družbena pojava načenjata bistvo vrednot, na katerih temeljijo liberalne demokratične družbe, ni presenetljivo, da so se mednarodna skupnost in posamezne države na te pojave odzvale s sprejemanjem represivne zakonodaje. V ta namen je tudi Slovenija leta 2011 sprejela Zakon o odvzemu premoženja nezakonitega izvora, s katerim skuša država bolj učinkovito posegati v problematiko nezakonito pridobljenega premoženja.V magistrski nalogi bom predstavila zgoraj naveden zakon, ki ureja novo obliko posega v lastninsko pravico posameznika. Z uvedbo tega instituta se je odprla vrsta vprašanj, na katere bom skušala v tej nalogi tudi odgovoriti. S pomočjo kriterijev, ki so se izoblikovali v sodni praksi Vrhovnega sodišča in ESČP, se bom opredelila do pravne narave ukrepa po ZOPNI, ki je zaradi kazenskopravnih elementov, ki jih zakon vsebuje, utemeljeno vprašljiva. V tem kontekstu se bom ukvarjala tudi s primernostjo civilnopravnih elementov, ki jih ZOPNI vsebuje, kot so obrnjeno dokazno breme in nizki dokazni standardi. Zanimalo me bo tudi, kako je ta institut urejen na mednarodni ravni in ravni Evropske unije. Z odpravo notranji meja v EU so se namreč pojavili tudi negativni vidiki te integracije, ki se kažejo v strmem porastu kriminalitete, ki je presegla nacionalne okvirje.
Ključne besede
Ni podatka o ključnih besedah
Podatki
Jezik: |
Slovenski jezik |
Leto izida: |
2018 |
Tipologija: |
2.09 - Magistrsko delo |
Organizacija: |
EVRO-PF - Evropska pravna fakulteta v Novi Gorici |
Založnik: |
[R. Lah] |
UDK: |
347.234(043.2) |
COBISS: |
2053202358
|
Št. ogledov: |
8 |
Št. prenosov: |
1 |
Ocena: |
0 (0 glasov) |
Metapodatki: |
|
Ostali podatki
Sekundarni jezik: |
Angleški jezik |
Sekundarni povzetek: |
Among the biggest problems facing today's society are undoubtedly terrorism and organized crime in connection with corruption. Since these two social phenomena form the core of the values on which liberal democratic societies are based, it is not surprising that the international community and individual states responded to these phenomena by adopting repressive legislation. For this purposeal so Slovenia in 2011 adopted The Law onthe assets of illicit origin forfeiture, to regulate more effectively the problem of illegally obtained property.In the master thesis I will present The Law on the assets of illicit origin forfeiture which establishes a new form of interference with the individual's right of property. The institute on the assets of illicit origin forfeitureopens a series of questions, to which I will try to answer in this thesis. With the criteria set by the Supreme court and European court of human rights I will define the true nature of the action, which is reasonably questionable due to the criminal law elements contained in te adopted legislation. In this context I will also deal with the adequacy of the civil law institutes included into The Law on the assets of illicit origin forfeiture, such as the reversed burden of proof and low evidentiary standards. I will also be interested in the regulation of the assets of illicit origin forfeiture at the international and European Union level. By eliminating borders and establishing the freedoms of the EU's internal market have also appeared negative aspects of this integration. These negative aspects are reflected in increased crime that exceeded national borders. |
Sekundarne ključne besede: |
Premoženje;Magistrske naloge;Odvzem; |
Vrsta dela (COBISS): |
Magistrsko delo/naloga |
Komentar na gradivo: |
Evropska pravna fak. |
Komentar vira: |
Mag. delo 2. stopnje bolonjskega študija;
|
Strani: |
VI, 73 str. |
ID: |
10954629 |