Mreža pomoči družinam v stiski

magistrsko delo

Katja Oset (Avtor), Milko Poštrak (Mentor)

Povzetek

Zaradi gospodarskih kriz, zdravstvenih stanj, nizkih plač in dolgov, se mnogo družin znajde v socialni stiski. Mreža pomoči družinam v stiski vključuje sicer uraden sistem socialne varnosti, vendar pogosto pomoč, ki jo družine dobijo na CSD-ju (socialna podpora, otroški dodatki,...), ne zadošča. Poleg državnih pomoči mreža vključuje tudi nevladne organizacije, ki igrajo čedalje bolj pomembno vlogo. Skozi pričujoče delo sem želela raziskati predvsem to mrežo povezanosti vladnih in nevladnih organizacij ter njihovo videnje celotne mreže pomoči. Zanimalo me je, kako dobra je ta mreža v očeh tistih, ki dnevno pomagajo družinam v stiski in, kaj so njene največje pomanjkljivosti. Želela sem se prepričati, da imajo družine na razpolago formalne oblike pomoči in strokovnjake, pri katerih lahko poiščejo podporo. V prvem delu naloge predstavim družino in socialno stisko, socialne mreže, socialno in družinsko politiko ter vlogo socialnega dela, centrov za socialno delo in nevladnih organizacij v mreži pomoči družinam v stiski. V drugem, empiričnem delu pa predstavim metodologijo in rezultate kvalitativne raziskave, ki sem jo opravila s strokovnimi delavci organizacij mreže pomoči družinam v socialni stiski. Merski pripomoček, ki sem ga pri tem uporabila, je bil vprašalnik, metoda zbiranja podatkov pa intervju. Ugotovila sem, da je pomoč skupno vodilo organizacij mreže pomoči in, da večina uporabnikov to mrežo uporablja dolga leta, razen v nekaterih izrednih primerih, kot sta recimo smrt ali naravne nesreče. Tako vladne kot nevladne organizacije sprejmejo vse uporabnike in se jim trudijo pomagati ali pa jih vsaj usmeriti tja, kjer se jim bo lahko pomagalo. Večina družin je o mreži pomoči dobro informirana, obstajajo pa tudi slabo informirane družine. Mreža pomoči je, splošno gledano, dobra, pokrije precej družin in ima kvalitetno zakonodajo. Njena največja slabost pa je premajhna povezanost med organizacijami, predvsem med nevladnimi organizacijami in CSD-ji, zato vidim večjo povezanost kot enega od najpomembnejših predlogov izboljšanja mreže pomoči. Socialna stiska povzroča pri družinah socialno stigmo, ki jo zaznajo tudi strokovni delavci in se z njimi poskušajo boriti proti njej, tako da družine opolnomočijo. Moj predlog je, da se tudi javnost osvešča o socialni stiski, da jo bo bolje razumela, prav tako pa naj se ne izpostavlja družin. Minimalna plača je eden izmed najpogostejših razlogov za socialno stisko, zato menim, da bi bilo dobro družinam z minimalno plačo spremeniti cenzus in omogočiti več subvencij. Še en pomemben predlog pa je socialna aktivacija družin, zato da si dokažejo, da zmorejo in ne ostajajo v krogu revščine.

Ključne besede

mreže pomoči;družina;socialna stiska;socialna ogroženost;nevladne organizacije;centri za socialno delo;

Podatki

Jezik:	Slovenski jezik
Leto izida:	2020
Tipologija:	2.09 - Magistrsko delo
Organizacija:	UL FSD - Fakulteta za socialno delo
Založnik:	[K. Oset]
UDK:	364.65-055.5/.7
COBISS:	37571331
Št. ogledov:	501
Št. prenosov:	151
Ocena:	0 (0 glasov)
Metapodatki:

Ostali podatki

Sekundarni jezik:	Angleški jezik
Sekundarni naslov:	Net help for families in distress
Sekundarni povzetek:	Because of economy crisis, health conditions, low payments, debts, families often end up in social distress. Net help for families in distress contains official system of social security, but often help which families get in social work centers (social support, child benefits) is not enough. Beside governmental help, net help includes also non-governmental organizations, that play increasingly more important role. During assignment I wanted to research net of connectedness between governmental and non-governmental organizations in their vision of entire net help. I was wondering how good is this net in the eyes of those who daily help families in distress and what are the biggest imperfections of net. I wanted to make sure that families have formal forms of help and experts at which they can find support. In first part of assignment I introduce family and social distress, social networks, social and family politics, role of social work, social work centers and non-governmental organizations in net help for families in distress. In second, empirical part, I introduce methodology and results of qualitative research, which was done with professional workers of organizations from net help for families in distress. Measuring tool, used in my research, was a questionnaire and method was interview. I discovered that help in common principle for organizations in net help and that most of nethelp users are long-time users. They are some exceptions in unexpected conditions like deaths or nature disasters. Governmental and non-governmental organizations accept everyone and try to help them or at least direct them to place where they can get help. Most of the families are well informed about help net but there are also families that are poorly informed. Net help is, in general, looking good, covers a lot of families and has quality legislation. Its biggest weakness is lack of connectedness, especially between non-governmental organizations and social work centers. Because of that I see higher level of connectedness as one of the most important prepositions for improving the net help. Social distress causes social stigma which is felt also by expert workers, who try to fight against stigma with empowerment of families. My preposition is to inform public more about social distress, so they will be able to understand it and also not to expose families in social distress. Minimum wage is one of the most common reasons for social distress, so I think it would be good for families with minimum wage to transform cenzus and allow them more subsidies. Another important preposition is social activation of families to prove themselves they can do it and that there is no need for them to stay in the circle of poverty.
Sekundarne ključne besede:	net help;family;social distress;non-governmental organizations;social work centers;
Vrsta dela (COBISS):	Magistrsko delo/naloga
Študijski program:	0
Konec prepovedi (OpenAIRE):	1970-01-01
Komentar na gradivo:	Univ. v Ljubljani, Fakulteta za socialno delo
Strani:	1 spletni vir (1 datoteka PDF (150 str.))
ID:	12027723