diplomsko delo
Inka Rupnik (Avtor), Matjaž Roblek (Mentor)

Povzetek

Problem: Klasičen sistem planiranja proizvodnje, v literaturi prepoznan tudi kot model hierahičnega planiranja proizvodnje ali MRP II (Manufacturing resource planning) ali koncept MRP/CRP (Material / Capacity requirements planning) ali klasični MRP, nam ne omogoča optimalnega planiranja in natančnega pregleda zalog, ker modul MRP ne upošteva operacij, ki so v teku. Pri klasičnem planiranju MRP naročila niso zaključena ob pravem času, kajti pretok informacij in podatkov je prepočasen. Namen: Namen diplomske naloge je narediti primerjalno analizo klasičnega hierarhičnega planiranja MRP proizvodnje in sodobnega planiranja DDOM (Demand driven operating model). Metode in orodja: Raziskovali smo literaturo s področja hierarhičnega planiranja MRP proizvodnje in planiranja DDOM. Analizirali smo gradiva o izobraževanju planiranja proizvodnje GlobalBikelnc v SAP/R3 in SAP4HANA. Primerjali smo orodji SAP/R3 in SAP4HANA ter naredili primerjalno analizo aktivnosti in ukazov za izvedbo izobraževanja med SAP/R3 in SAP4HANA. Naredili smo tudi primerjalno analizo klasičnega planiranja in planiranja DDOM. Rezultat diplomskega dela: Klasičen sistem planiranja proizvodnje, v literaturi prepoznan tudi kot model hierahičnega planiranja proizvodnje ali MRP II (Manufacturing resource planning) ali koncept MRP/CRP (Material / Capacity requirements planning) ali klasični MRP, nam ne omogoča optimalnega planiranja in natančnega pregleda zalog, ker modul MRP ne upošteva operacij, ki so v teku. Pri klasičnem planiranju MRP naročila niso zaključena ob pravem času, kajti pretok informacij in podatkov je prepočasen.

Ključne besede

primerjalna analiza;oskrbovalna veriga;informacijska tehnologija;programska oprema;DDOM.;

Podatki

Jezik: Slovenski jezik
Leto izida:
Tipologija: 2.11 - Diplomsko delo
Organizacija: UM FOV - Fakulteta za organizacijske vede
Založnik: [I. Rupnik]
UDK: 658.5
COBISS: 77230851 Povezava se bo odprla v novem oknu
Št. ogledov: 255
Št. prenosov: 19
Ocena: 0 (0 glasov)
Metapodatki: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Ostali podatki

Sekundarni jezik: Angleški jezik
Sekundarni naslov: Comparative analysis of ddom and hierarchical concept of production planning
Sekundarni povzetek: Problem: The classical production planning system, also recognized in the literature as a model of hierarchical production planning or MRP II (Manufacturing resource planning) or the concept of MRP / CRP (Material / Capacity requirements planning) or classical MRP, does not allow us optimal planning and accurate inventory review because MRP the module does not take into account ongoing operations. In classic MRP planning, orders are not completed at the right time because the flow of information and data is too slow. Purpose: The purpose of the thesis is to make a comparative analysis of the classic hierarchical MRP production planning and modern DDOM (Demand driven operating model) planning. Methods and tools: Research of literature in the field of hierarchical MRP production planning and DDOM planning. Analysis of materials on GlobalBikelnc production planning education in SAP / R3 and SAP4HANA. We compared SAP / R3 and SAP4HANA tools and made a comparative analysis of activities and commands for conducting training between SAP / R3 and SAP4HANA. We also performed a comparative analysis of classical planning and DDOM planning. Thesis result: In the comparative analysis, we found out what the new functionalities are in modern planning and we found that it is a classic planning only with advanced additions. Based on the analysis of the current situation, the advantages of the SAP4HANA tool and the improvements brought by its introduction are also shown. The most noticeable improvement of the tool is the program structure. We found that the GBI HANA is made according to classic planning.
Sekundarne ključne besede: Načrtovanje;Univerzitetna in visokošolska dela;
Vrsta dela (COBISS): Diplomsko delo/naloga
Komentar na gradivo: Univ. v Mariboru, Fak. za organizacijske vede
Strani: V, 52 f.
ID: 13270702