diplomsko delo
David Gracar (Avtor), Bruno Nikolić (Mentor)

Povzetek

Diplomsko delo obravnava normativno ureditev človekove pravice do svobode gibanja v Sloveniji in Nemčiji, vladne ukrepe, ki so to pravico omejevali, ter njihovo skladnost z ustavo. Svoboda gibanja je ena od temeljnih človekovih pravic in svoboščin. Njena zgodovina sega že v antiko, ureditev, kakršno poznamo danes, pa se je pojavila v času po drugi svetovni vojni. V Sloveniji je urejena z ustavo, ki državljanom zagotavlja prosto gibanje, izbiro prebivališča ter zapuščanje in vračanje v državo. Določeni so tudi pogoji, znotraj katerih lahko to pravico omejujemo, in sicer v času razglasitve izrednega stanja ter prek predpisovanja načina njenega uresničevanja z zakonom. Pri slednjem je nujno, da upoštevamo načelo sorazmernosti. Vladni ukrepi v Sloveniji in Nemčiji so bili sestavljeni iz omejevanja gibanja na občine, statistične regije in zvezne države, uvedena je bila policijska ura, omejeno pa je bilo tudi prehajanje državne meje. Veliko teh ukrepov je povzročilo nestrinjanje javnosti in pravnih strokovnjakov, kar je privedlo tudi do presoj ustavnosti s strani sodišč. V Sloveniji se je za neustavnega izkazal Zakon o nalezljivih boleznih, na podlagi katerega je bilo sprejetih več odlokov, ki so omejevali svobodo gibanja. V Nemčiji je bil podoben zakon po hitrem postopku dopolnjen in nadgrajen, kar je prav tako dvignilo vprašanja o ustavnosti ukrepov. Pomembne razlike so se pokazale tudi v obliki politične organizacije v Nemčiji, saj je le-ta federalna država in se bistveno razlikuje od Slovenije. Iz primerjave ukrepov je razvidno, da so bili ukrepi v Sloveniji in Nemčiji enakovredni v strogosti ter da so človekove pravice omejevali primerljivo. Diplomsko delo je uporabno zato, da bralcem razširi obzorje in jim omogoči boljše razumevanje ene od njihovih temeljnih pravic, prav tako pa jih lahko spodbudi k večjemu zanimanju in javnemu vključevanju v diskurz glede omenjene problematike.

Ključne besede

svoboda gibanja;COVID-19;načelo sorazmernosti;ustavnost;

Podatki

Jezik: Slovenski jezik
Leto izida:
Tipologija: 2.11 - Diplomsko delo
Organizacija: UL FU - Fakulteta za upravo
Založnik: [D. Gracar]
UDK: 343.263(497.4:430):616.98:578.834
COBISS: 83778307 Povezava se bo odprla v novem oknu
Št. ogledov: 566
Št. prenosov: 204
Ocena: 0 (0 glasov)
Metapodatki: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Ostali podatki

Sekundarni jezik: Angleški jezik
Sekundarni naslov: Constitutionality of limiting the freedom of movement during the COVID-19 epidemic in Slovenia and Germany
Sekundarni povzetek: The diploma thesis deals with the normative regulation of the human right to freedom of movement in Slovenia and Germany, government measures that restricted this right and their compliance with the Constitution. Freedom of movement is one of the fundamental human rights and freedoms. Its history dates back to antiquity, and the arrangement as we know it today appeared in the period after World War II. In Slovenia, it is regulated by the Constitution, which guarantees citizens free movement, choice of residence and leaving and returning to the country. The conditions within which this right can be restricted are also determined, namely at the time of declaring a state of emergency and by law. In the latter case, it is essential that we observe the principle of proportionality. Government measures in Slovenia and Germany consisted of restricting movement to municipalities, statistical regions, and the federal state, a curfew was introduced, and the crossing of the state border was restricted. Many of these measures have been met with disagreement from the public and legal experts, which has also led to a constitutional review by the courts. In Slovenia, the Infectious Diseases Act proved unconstitutional, on the basis of which several decrees restricting freedom of movement were adopted. In Germany, a similar law was expeditiously amended and upgraded, which again raised questions about the constitutionality of the measures. Important differences also arose in the governmental composition of Germany itself, which differs significantly from the Slovene system. A comparison of the measures shows that the measures in Slovenia and Germany were comparable and that they restricted human rights similarly. The diploma thesis is useful in order to broaden the horizons of readers and enable them to better understand one of their fundamental rights, and it can also encourage them to be more interested and publicly involved in the discourse on this issue.
Sekundarne ključne besede: freedom of movement;COVID-19;principle of proportionality;constitutionality;
Vrsta dela (COBISS): Diplomsko delo/naloga
Študijski program: 1000529
Komentar na gradivo: Univ. v Ljubljani, Fak. za upravo
Strani: IX, 47 str.
ID: 13715174