(magistrsko diplomsko delo)
Miha Plahutnik (Avtor), Saša Zagorc (Mentor)

Povzetek

Kriza vladavine prava je eden izmed najtežjih izzivov, s katerimi se Evropska unija sooča v zadnjem desetletju, njena osrednja razsežnost pa so sistematični napadi na pravosodje. Pristop Evropske unije k reševanju krize se zdi neučinkovit, kar gotovo velja za poskuse Evropske komisije. Slednja je zapravila ogromno časa za dialog s težavnimi državami članicami, katerih politične elite so zastavile načrten odmik od vrednote vladavine prava, pravo pa le instrumentarizirale za utrditev oblasti. Evropska komisija je z upanjem v dialog težavne države članice zgolj opogumila in jim omogočila sprejem spornih pravosodnih reform in ugrabitev neodvisnih pravosodnih organov. Enako slabo se je Evropska komisija odrezala v tožbah zoper težavne države članice, saj se je prepogosto osredotočila zgolj na formalno zmago pred Sodiščem Evropske unije. Slednje je prav zato izkoristilo predhodno vprašanje portugalskega sodišča v zadevi C-64/16 - Associação Sindical dos Juízes Portugueses in poudarilo položaj nacionalnih sodnikov kot evropskih sodnikov ter njihov pomen za celotni pravni red Evropske unije. S to ključno sodbo je Sodišče Evropske unije Evropski komisiji v roke porinilo primerno orožje za boj s krizo vladavine prava v posamezni državi članici, hkrati pa nacionalnim sodnikom ponudilo dodatno možnost varovanja njihove neodvisnosti. Na podlagi navedenega primera je Evropska komisija sprožila vrsto tožb proti Poljski, ki so slednjo vsaj deloma prisilile v opustitev nekaterih spornih pravosodnih reform. Dejstvo pa je, da krize vladavine prava institucije Evropske unije ne morejo premagati same, najpomembnejši korak bodo morali narediti državljani posamezne države članice in na naslednjih volitvah izkazati željo po spoštovanju vladavine prava.

Ključne besede

vladavina prava;kriza vladavine prava;Evropska unija;Sodišče Evropske unije;Evropska komisija;nacionalni sodniki;pravosodne reforme;sodniška neodvisnost;Poljska;Madžarska;magistrske diplomske naloge;

Podatki

Jezik: Slovenski jezik
Leto izida:
Tipologija: 2.09 - Magistrsko delo
Organizacija: UL PF - Pravna fakulteta
Založnik: [M. Plahutnik]
UDK: 342:347.9(043.2)
COBISS: 96375299 Povezava se bo odprla v novem oknu
Št. ogledov: 209
Št. prenosov: 45
Ocena: 0 (0 glasov)
Metapodatki: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Ostali podatki

Sekundarni jezik: Angleški jezik
Sekundarni naslov: The role of national judges as European judges in protecting the rule of law
Sekundarni povzetek: The rule of law crisis is one of the most formidable challenges the European Union has faced during the last decade, with the core problem of systematic attacks on judiciary. Attempts of the European Union to solve the crisis seem inefficient, which is especially true for European Commission's response. The latter spent too much time engaging in dialog with problematic member states, whose political elites purposefully turned away from rule of law values and used law simply as a tool to entrench power. European Commission's faith in dialog thus only emboldened troublesome member states and enabled them to pass controversial judicial reforms and capture independent judicial bodies. European Commission was equally ineffective in bringing infringement cases against member states as it was too often satisfied with a formal victory in front of the Court of Justice. The latter therefore took a preliminary question from a Portuguese court in the case C-64/16 - Associação Sindical dos Juízes Portugueses and used it to highlight the role of national judges as European judges as well as their importance for the legal order of the European Union. With this crucial ruling the Court of Justice gave the European Commission appropriate weaponry to combat rule of law crisis in individual member states, while offering additional protection to the national judges. On the basis of the aforementioned ruling the European Commission was able to bring several infringement actions against Poland which forced the latter to abandon some of its controversial judicial reforms. However, European Union’s institutions cannot solve the rule of law crisis on their own. The most important step must be made by citizens of problematic member states. They have to express their wish for rule of law adherence in the next elections.
Sekundarne ključne besede: rule of law;rule of law crisis;European Union;Court of Justice of the European Union;European Commission;national judges;judicial reforms;judicial independence;Poland;Hungary;
Vrsta dela (COBISS): Magistrsko delo/naloga
Študijski program: 0
Konec prepovedi (OpenAIRE): 1970-01-01
Komentar na gradivo: Univ. v Ljubljani, Pravna fak.
Strani: VIII, 66 f.
ID: 14354400