Materialna in formalna veljavnost arbitražnega sporazuma

doktorska disertacija

Minu A. Gvardjančič (Avtor), Aleš Galič (Mentor), Lojze Ude (Član komisije za zagovor), Špela Mežnar (Član komisije za zagovor)

Povzetek

Arbitraža predstavlja postopek sporazumnega in zasebnega mehanizma reševanja sporov, ki se zaključi z izdajo arbitražne odločbe. Arbitražni sporazum ali arbitražna klavzula predstavlja temeljni kamen arbitraže, zaradi česar je za stranki, ki sta se s sklenitvijo arbitražnega sporazuma želeli izogniti sodnemu reševanju spora, bistveno, da je arbitražni sporazum veljaven in izvršljiv. Prav ta dogovorni temelj arbitraže namreč predstavlja bistveno razliko med arbitražo in sodnim postopkom. V prvem delu doktorske disertacije so predstavljene temeljne lastnosti arbitražnega sporazuma, njegove sestavine (obvezne in fakultativne) ter njegova pravna narava. Z arbitražnim sporazumom povezujemo tudi dve splošno priznani in v večini držav uzakonjeni načeli, in sicer doktrino ločenosti arbitražnega sporazuma od glavne pogodbe in načelo kompetence o kompetenci. Prvo poglavje disertacije zaključuje poglobljena analiza odnosa arbitraže in sodišča glede vprašanja (ne)veljavnosti arbitražnega sporazuma in uveljavljanja slednjega v praksi. Doktorska disertacija je v osnovi primerjalnopravna študija. Vendar pa predmet disertacije ne bo zgolj primerjava mednarodnih in (nekaterih) nacionalnih pravnih virov in arbitražnih pravil, temveč bo v njej obravnavan tudi razvoj razumevanja pojma soglasje k arbitražnemu načinu reševanja sporov. Osrednji del disertacije bo tako namenjen analizi materialne veljavnosti arbitražnega sporazuma, in sicer z vidika obstoja in interpretacije soglasja strank k arbitražnemu reševanju sporov, določitve merodajnega materialnega prava ter ugotavljanja objektivnega in subjektivnega obsega arbitražnega sporazuma. Zadnji del doktorske disertacije bo namenjen formalni veljavnosti arbitražnega sporazuma. Še danes je namreč (razen redkih izjem v nacionalnih ureditvah) splošno sprejeto, da je arbitražni sporazum veljaven le, če je sklenjen v pisni obliki. Enako kot razumevanje soglasja k arbitražnemu načinu reševanja sporov pa se je tudi zahteva po pisnosti arbitražnega sporazuma z razvojem in popularizacijo arbitraže spreminjala in je zdaj precej liberalizirana, v nekaterih državah celo odpravljena.

Ključne besede

arbitražni sporazumi;neodvisnost arbitražnega sporazuma;kompetenca o kompetenci;soglasje;objektivni obseg arbitražnega sporazuma;subjektivni obseg arbitražnega sporazuma;merodajno pravo;pisna oblika;disertacije;

Podatki

Jezik:	Slovenski jezik
Leto izida:	2021
Tipologija:	2.08 - Doktorska disertacija
Organizacija:	UL PF - Pravna fakulteta
Založnik:	[M. A. Gvardjančič]
UDK:	347.918(043.3)
COBISS:	104851971
Št. ogledov:	204
Št. prenosov:	95
Ocena:	0 (0 glasov)
Metapodatki:

Ostali podatki

Sekundarni jezik:	Angleški jezik
Sekundarni naslov:	Material and formal validity of arbitration agreement
Sekundarni povzetek:	Arbitration is a private and consensual method of dispute resolution, which (generally) results with issuing of an arbitration award. Arbitration agreement or arbitration clause represents a foundation stone of any arbitration proceedings; therefore it is crucial for the parties who by concluding the arbitration agreement wanted to exclude jurisdiction of the courts to decide on their dispute, that arbitration agreement is valid and enforceable. Arbitration agreement as a foundation of arbitration therfore represents the main difference between arbitration and court proceedings. In the first part of the thesis main features of arbitration agreement are analyzed, its elements (voluntary and obligatory) and legal nature. Arbitration agreement entails also two widespread and in most countries recognized principles of arbitration, namely doctrine of severability of arbitration agreement and competence rule. The first chapter of thesis will be concluded with a thorough analysis of relation between the court and the arbitral tribunal regarding the question of who and when decides on the (in)validity of arbitration agreement in practice. The thesis represents a comparative study. However the object of this thesis does not involve only a comparison of international and (some) national legal sources and arbitration rules, but also analyzes a development of understanding of consent of parties to resolve their disputes through arbitration. The main focus of the thesis is therefore an analysis of material validity of arbitration agreement, namely interpretation of consent of parties to conclude arbitration agreement, law governing material validity of arbitration agreement and objective and subjective scope of arbitration agreement. In the last part of the thesis the object of study is formal validity of arbitration agreement. Today it is still a widely recognized rule (subject to few exemptions in national legislations) that arbitration agreement is valid only if it is concluded in writing. However, similar as the development of understanding of parties’ consent to conclude an arbitration agreement, also writing requirement of form of arbitration agreement has gone through changing process in the last decades. Especially under influence of popularization of international commercial arbitration the writing form requirement of arbitration agreements became more liberalized and in some countries even completely abolished.
Sekundarne ključne besede:	arbitration agreement;autonomy of the arbitration agreement;competenz-competenz;consent;objective scope;subjective scope;law governing arbitration agreement;writing form requirement;Univerzitetna in visokošolska dela;Arbitraže in odločbe;
Vrsta dela (COBISS):	Doktorsko delo/naloga
Študijski program:	0
Konec prepovedi (OpenAIRE):	1970-01-01
Komentar na gradivo:	Univ. v Ljubljani, Pravna fak.
Strani:	263 f.
ID:	14649371