ǂthe ǂrole of power relations and transaction costs
Marko Lah (Avtor), Andrej Sušjan (Avtor)

Povzetek

The article attempts to combine Alfred Eichner’s institutionalist theory of the megacorp and a corresponding definition of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) with transaction cost theory (TCT) based on firms’ asset specificity. We have identified three types of SMEs: subcontracting SMEs as “spokes” within hub-megacorp network, independent SMEs as local competitors of megacorps, and SMEs as partners in cluster networks. The article outlines some distinctive features of the three types and then concentrates on subcontracting SMEs, presenting their submission to megacorp’s power through mark-down pricing and their consequent inability to grow. We mention some illustrative examples from Slovenia, a small transition economy, in which many SMEs have been part of international megacorps’ supply chains. We conclude that TCT, in spite of its neoclassical paradigmatic background, enriches the institutionalist approach to SMEs without changing its evolutionary character, inherited from old institutionalism.

Ključne besede

majhna in srednja podjetja;institutionalizem;post-keynesianizem;teorija;SMEs;institutionalism;post-keynesianism;theory;

Podatki

Jezik: Angleški jezik
Leto izida:
Tipologija: 1.01 - Izvirni znanstveni članek
Organizacija: UL EF - Ekonomska fakulteta
UDK: 330.1
COBISS: 123865859 Povezava se bo odprla v novem oknu
ISSN: 0021-3624
Št. ogledov: 70
Št. prenosov: 24
Ocena: 0 (0 glasov)
Metapodatki: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Ostali podatki

Sekundarni jezik: Slovenski jezik
Sekundarne ključne besede: majhna in srednja podjetja;institutionalizem;postkeynesianizem;teorija;
Vrsta dela (COBISS): Članek v reviji
Strani: str. 721-740
Letnik: ǂVol. ǂ56
Zvezek: ǂiss. ǂ3
Čas izdaje: 2022
DOI: 10.1080/00213624.2022.2079933
ID: 16716399
Priporočena dela:
, ǂthe ǂrole of power relations and transaction costs
, ǂthe ǂcase of the Slovenian SMEs
, is there complementarity between R&D subsidies and R&D tax credits?