diplomsko delo
Katja Sovič (Avtor), Tina Sever (Mentor)

Povzetek

Splošni upravni postopek je urejen v Zakonu o splošnem upravnem postopku. Vsak upravni postopek ima dva nujna udeleženca, to sta stranka in upravni organ. Upravni postopek lahko sproži organ po uradni dolžnosti ali stranka, ki je lahko fizična ali pravna oseba. Ločimo splošne in posebne upravne postopke. Za posebne upravne postopke velja subsidiarna raba Zakona o splošnem upravnem postopku, kar pomeni, da se lahko posamezna vprašanja, ki niso urejena v zakonu, uredijo drugače. Slovenski splošni upravni postopek je v nalogi primerjan s hrvaškim, podane pa so tudi podobnosti in razlike. Dokazna postopka v Sloveniji in v Republiki Hrvaški se med seboj ne razlikujeta. V obeh državah poznamo pet dokaznih sredstev, ki se tudi v praksi uporabljajo in delujejo enako. V Sloveniji upravni postopek ureja devet temeljnih načel, medtem ko imajo in upoštevajo v Republiki Hrvaški deset temeljnih načel. Namen dela je proučiti in raziskati, katera so dokazna sredstva v obeh državah, kakšne so razlike in podobnosti v njunih ureditvah. V diplomskem delu sta bili glede na postavljen okvir raziskovanja, namena in cilja preverjeni dve hipotezi. Prva se nanaša na teoretično razsežnost, kjer so razlike med slovensko in hrvaško zakonodajo predstavljene teoretično; druga pa na empirično raziskavo v upravno-sodni praksi, kjer je bilo analizirano, zaradi katerega dokaznega sredstva se v upravnem postopku sproži največ upravnih sporov. Delo bo pozitivno vplivalo na uradne osebe, ki se srečujejo z dokaznimi sredstvi, in na vse, ki želijo to področje dodatno raziskati. Tako se bodo bolj zavedali pravilne uporabe dokaznih sredstev, kadar gre za dokazovanje v upravnih zadevah.

Ključne besede

splošni upravni postopek;dokazovanje;dokazna sredstva;dokazni postopek;temeljna načela.;

Podatki

Jezik: Slovenski jezik
Leto izida:
Tipologija: 2.11 - Diplomsko delo
Organizacija: UL FU - Fakulteta za upravo
Založnik: [K. Sovič]
UDK: 3.077.3(497.4:497.5)(043.2)
COBISS: 140178435 Povezava se bo odprla v novem oknu
Št. ogledov: 60
Št. prenosov: 33
Ocena: 0 (0 glasov)
Metapodatki: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Ostali podatki

Sekundarni jezik: Angleški jezik
Sekundarni naslov: Proving in administrative proceedings in Slovenia and Republic of Croatia
Sekundarni povzetek: General administrative procedure is regulated by the General Administrative Procedure Act. Every administrative procedure has two necessary participants, i.e. a client and an administrative authority. The administrative procedure may be initiated by an authority ex officio or a client, who can be a natural or a legal person. We differentiate between general and specific administrative procedures. The subsidiary implementation of the General Administrative Procedure Act is applied to specific administrative procedures, which means that individual issues not regulated by the law may be regulated differently. We compared the Slovenian general administrative procedure to the Croatian one, identifying similarities and differences. The evidentiary procedure in Slovenia and in the Republic of Croatia do not differ. The systems of both countries comprise five means of evidence, used in practice and functioning in the same way. The Slovenian administrative procedure is regulated by nine fundamental principles, while citizens of the Republic of Croatia have and follow ten fundamental principles. The aim of this paper is to consider and study what means of evidence are used in both countries as well as the differences and similarities in their arrangements. In terms of the set framework of research, aim and goal, the paper examines two hypotheses. The first relates to a theoretical dimension, where differences between the Slovenian and Croatian laws are presented in theory, while the second relates to an empirical study in the administrative case-law, where we analysed which means of evidence in the administrative procedure initiate the most administrative disputes. The paper will have a positive impact on officials who deal with means of evidence and all who desire to further study this field. In this way, they will be more aware of the correct use of means of evidence when it comes to providing evidence in administrative matters.
Sekundarne ključne besede: general administrative procedure;providing evidence;means of evidence;evidentiary procedure;fundamental principles.;
Vrsta dela (COBISS): Diplomsko delo/naloga
Študijski program: 1000530
Konec prepovedi (OpenAIRE): 1970-01-01
Komentar na gradivo: Univ. v Ljubljani, Fak. za upravo
Strani: X, 64 str.
ID: 17832765