magistrsko delo
Laura Lugarić (Avtor), Darja Tadič (Mentor)

Povzetek

Uporaba prepovedi vstopa je praksa, ki jo v mladinskih centrih uporabljajo za vzpostavljanje discipline in obvladovanje neželenega vedenja med mladimi, lahko pa ima zelo negativne učinke, saj so izključeni mladi tako odrinjeni in izolirani ter ostanejo brez dostopa do dodatne podpore. Moje magistrsko delo se bo tako ukvarjalo z raziskovanjem izreka prepovedi vstopa oz. z izključevanjem mladostnikov iz mladinskih centrov ter s tem, kako mladinski delavci razumejo pomen in posledice takega izključevanja. Osredotočalo se bo tudi na pomen tovrstnega izključevanja za delo mladinskih delavcev ter na možnosti razvijanja alternativnih oblik ukrepov in razvijanje bolj inkluzivnih praks. V teoretičnem delu magistrske naloge bom naredila pregled literature iz področja mladinskega dela, mladinskih centrov, kaznovanja in discipliniranja ter posledic, povezanih z izrekanjem tovrstnih kazi. Namen empiričnega dela bo preveriti, s kakšnimi razlogi se mlade iz mladinskih centrov v Sloveniji izključuje, kako na takšen pristop gledajo mladinski delavci znotraj mladinskih centrov ter kakšne so možnosti in potrebe razvijanja bolj inkluzivnih praks. Uporabljena bo kvalitativna metoda skupinskega intervjuja na vzorcu 6 mladinskih centrov. Podatki bodo analizirani z metodo induktivnega kodiranja. Pomen pričakovanih ugotovitev pa bo pregled obstoječih praks kaznovanja v mladinskih centrih in s tem odpiranje prostora za razvoj novih, boljših praks. Rezultati raziskave kažejo, da so s prepovedjo vstopa pogosto kaznovana vedenja, ki so označena kot »izstopajoča« ali »moreča«. Največjo vlogo pri odločanju pa naj bi igrali medsebojno vzpostavljeni odnosi, poznavanje ozadja posameznikov in osebna prepričanja mladinskih delavcev. Čeprav so mnenja mladinskih delavcev o izključevanju različna, ga pogosto prepoznavajo kot neučinkovito sankcijo, ki pa se je pri svojem delu še vedno poslužujejo. Sodelujoči prepoznavajo različne vplive teh izključitev, tako na njih same in njihovo delovno okolje kot na ostale udeležence v mladinskem centru. Pri svojem delu se poslužujejo različnih vrst prepovedi, dolžina prepovedi vstopa pa se giblje od dnevne do doživljenjske prepovedi. Rezultati kažejo, da svoje odločitve večkrat utemeljujejo na podlagi vedenja mladih ali kot skrb za ostale, prav tako pa se utemeljitve močno skladajo s splošnim mnenjem sogovornikov o prepovedih in izključevanju. Pred podajanjem prepovedi vstopa se mladinski delavci poslužujejo postopnih mehanizmov izključevanja, trudijo pa se ravnati tudi preventivno in uporabljati druge alternativne sankcije. Obenem pa se na področju večanja inkluzivnosti kaže manko strategij in idej.

Ključne besede

izključevanje;mladinsko delo;kaznovanje;

Podatki

Jezik: Slovenski jezik
Leto izida:
Tipologija: 2.09 - Magistrsko delo
Organizacija: UL PEF - Pedagoška fakulteta
Založnik: [L. Lugarić]
UDK: 316.344.7:061.2-053.6 (043.2)
COBISS: 226956291 Povezava se bo odprla v novem oknu
Št. ogledov: 34
Št. prenosov: 5
Ocena: 0 (0 glasov)
Metapodatki: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Ostali podatki

Sekundarni jezik: Angleški jezik
Sekundarni naslov: Exclusion of youth in youth centres
Sekundarni povzetek: The use of curfews is a practice employed in youth centers to instill discipline and control unwanted behavior among young people. However, it can have very negative effects, as excluded young people are pushed away, isolated, and left without access to additional support. My master’s thesis will therefore deal with the study of the prohibition of entry to or the exclusion of young people from youth centers and explore how youth workers understand the meaning and consequences of such exclusion. It will also focus on the importance of this type of exclusion in the work of youth workers and on the possibilities of developing alternative measures and more inclusive practices. In the theoretical part of my master’s thesis, I will review the literature in the fields of youth work, youth centers, punishment and discipline, and the consequences associated with the imposition of such punishments. The purpose of the empirical work will be to examine the reasons for excluding young people from youth centers in Slovenia, how youth workers within youth centers view such an approach, and what the possibilities and needs are for developing more inclusive practices. A qualitative group interview method will be used on a sample of six youth centers. The data will be analyzed using the inductive coding method. The significance of the expected findings will be the review of existing punishment practices in youth centers, thus opening up space for the development of new, better practices. The results of the research show that behavior deemed “outstanding” or “potential” is often punished by banning entry. Mutual relationships, knowledge of individuals’ backgrounds, and personal beliefs of youth workers should play the biggest role in decision-making. Although youth workers have different opinions about exclusion, they often recognize it as an ineffective sanction that they still resort to in their work. The participants recognize the various impacts of these exclusions, both on themselves and their working environment, as well as on the other participants in the youth center. In their work, they use different types of bans, and the length of the entry ban ranges from a day to a lifetime ban. The results show that they often justify their decisions based on the behavior of young people and as a concern for others, and the justifications are also strongly in line with the general opinion of the interlocutors about prohibitions and exclusion. Before banning entry, youth workers use gradual exclusion mechanisms, but they also try to act preventively and use other alternative sanctions. However, there is a lack of strategies and ideas in the field of increasing inclusivity.
Sekundarne ključne besede: exclusion;youth work;punishment;youth centers;Mladinski centri;Socialna pedagogika;Univerzitetna in visokošolska dela;
Vrsta dela (COBISS): Magistrsko delo/naloga
Študijski program: 0
Konec prepovedi (OpenAIRE): 1970-01-01
Komentar na gradivo: Univ. v Ljubljani, Pedagoška fak., Socialna pedagogika
Strani: 1 spletni vir (1 datoteka PDF (114 str.))
ID: 25931546