magistrsko delo
Marja Žnidarko (Avtor), Bojan Dobovšek (Mentor), Anton Dvoršek (Komentor)

Povzetek

Povečanje kriminalitete od organov odkrivanja in pregona kaznivih dejanj v zadnjem času zahteva, da se kadrovsko in strokovno prilagodijo tako, da so kos novim oblikam in razsežnostim kriminalitete. Pri tem je zelo pomembno, da so razmerja sodelujočih organov v predkazenskem postopku jasno določena in da je njihova naloga odkrivanja, preiskovanja in pregona storilcev kaznivih dejanj čim bolj učinkovita. V magistrskem delu smo se osredotočili predvsem na odnos med policijo in državnim tožilstvom, ki sodelujeta v predkazenskem postopku tako, da državni tožilec daje navodila in predloge v zvezi z zbiranjem obvestil in dokazov o pravno relevantnih dejstvih. Opredelili smo vlogo policije in državnega tožilca, ki je s sprejetjem 160.a člena Zakona o kazenskem postopku (2012) pridobil pravico, da z obveznimi navodili in strokovnimi mnenji usmerja zraven policije tudi druge državne organe in institucije. Pri njunem razmerju je zelo pomembna Uredba o sodelovanju državnega tožilstva, policije in drugih državnih organov in institucij pri odkrivanju in pregonu storilcev kaznivih dejanj ter delovanju specializiranih in skupnih preiskovalnih skupin (2010), ki zraven podrobnejših pravil o sodelovanju med obema organoma, podrobneje ureja tudi vzpostavitev specializirane preiskovalne skupine. V zadnjem delu magistrskega dela smo predstavili raziskavo, ki smo jo izvedli med kriminalisti v Sloveniji in s pomočjo katere smo želeli ugotoviti, kako ocenjujejo sodelovanje z državnimi tožilci. Ugotovili smo, da slovenski kriminalisti menijo, da uvedba Uredbe ni povečala učinkovitosti odkrivanja kaznivih dejanj, ampak je med drugim povzročila dodatno administracijo, ki je kriminalisti pri vsakodnevnem delu že tako ali tako imajo preveč. Med drugim slovenski kriminalisti ocenjujejo, da na vzpostavitev dobre komunikacije z državnimi tožilci v največji meri vpliva oblikovanje zaupnega in partnerskega odnosa med obema organoma. Kriminalistom največji problem pri sodelovanju z državnimi tožilci predstavlja dejstvo, da se zaradi hitre menjave kadrov na obeh straneh, kriminalisti in državni tožilci med seboj ne poznajo dovolj dobro. Menimo, da omenjen problem še dodatno otežuje možnost, da bi oba organa vzpostavila zaupanja vreden in partnerski odnos, ki sta pogoj za dobro sodelovanje in posledično tudi za uspešno preiskovanje kaznivih dejanj.

Ključne besede

predkazenski postopek;kriminalistična policija;kriminalisti;preiskovanje;državno tožilstvo;sodelovanje;magistrska dela;

Podatki

Jezik: Slovenski jezik
Leto izida:
Tipologija: 2.09 - Magistrsko delo
Organizacija: UM FVV - Fakulteta za varnostne vede
Založnik: M. Žnidarko]
UDK: 343.1+343.98(043.2)
COBISS: 2955242 Povezava se bo odprla v novem oknu
Št. ogledov: 1298
Št. prenosov: 270
Ocena: 0 (0 glasov)
Metapodatki: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Ostali podatki

Sekundarni jezik: Angleški jezik
Sekundarni povzetek: Lately, increase of criminality demands suitable adjustment through training and recruitment of staff of law enforcement authorities to be able to tackle new forms and dimensions of criminality. It is very important that relationships between cooperating authorities in pre-trial investigation are clearly defined so that their tasks of detection, investigation in prosecution of perpetrators of crime are as efficient as possible. The focus of this master’s thesis is predominantly on the relationship between the police department and the state prosecutor’s office, which cooperate in pre-trial investigation so that the state prosecutor gives instructions and suggestions regarding gathering of information and evidence on legally relevant facts. We have defined the role of the police department and state’s prosecutors, which has with adoption of the Article 160a of the Criminal Procedure Act (2012) gained the right not only to steer the police department with obligatory instructions and technical opinions but also other state authorities and institutions. A very important role in their relationship plays Decree on the cooperation between state prosecutor, police department and other state authorities and institutions in investigating and prosecuting of perpetrators of crime and in operation of specialised and joint investigation teams (2010), which besides detailed rules on cooperation between both authorities regulates establishment of a special investigation team. In the last part of the master’s thesis, we have presented a research conducted among criminal investigators in Slovenia by means of which we tried to find out how they evaluate cooperation with state prosecutors. We have discovered that Slovene criminal investigators consider that the implementation of the Decree has not enhanced the efficiency of crime investigation but has also burden them with additional paper work, which they already have too much in their regular work. Slovene criminal investigators evaluate, among other things, that good communication with state prosecutors has to be based on mutual trust and partnership. Criminal investigators identify as the biggest problem in cooperation with state prosecutors the fact that due to rapid change of staff on both sides criminal investigators and state prosecutors do not know each other well. We think that the above mentioned problem additionally hinders the possibility for both authorities to establish trustworthy partnership, which is necessary for good cooperation and consequently for successful investigation of crime.
URN: URN:SI:UM:
Vrsta dela (COBISS): Magistrsko delo/naloga
Komentar na gradivo: Univ. v Mariboru, Fak. za varnostne vede, Ljubljana
Strani: 94 str.
ID: 8751826