magistrsko delo
Saša Horvat Šimonka (Author), Simon Zupan (Mentor)

Abstract

Sodno tolmačenje je oblika tolmačenja in prevajanja, ki zahteva izvrstno usposobljenost tolmača oz. prevajalca tako na pravnem kot na jezikovnem področju. Zahteva po zagotovitvi tolmača v sodnih, predvsem kazenskih postopkih, in s tem zagotavljanje poštenega sojenja, sta skozi zgodovino postala del več mednarodnih dokumentov, pri čemer posebej izpostavljamo Evropsko konvencijo o človekovih pravicah in direktivo 2010/64/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta iz leta 2010. Področje sodnega tolmačenja je v različnih državah urejeno različno. V naši raziskavi smo se osredotočili na tri od njih, Slovenijo, Hrvaško in Združeno kraljestvo, in pri tem ugotovili, da so podobnosti in razlike v veliki meri pogojene s pravno tradicijo, ki ji država pripada. Povzeli smo značilnosti posameznih sistemov in na tej podlagi podali nekaj priporočil.

Keywords

magistrska dela;sodni tolmači;sodno tolmačenje;status;

Data

Language: Slovenian
Year of publishing:
Typology: 2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization: UM FF - Faculty of Arts
Publisher: [S. Horvat Šimonka]
UDC: 81'255(043.2)
COBISS: 228819459 Link will open in a new window
Views: 0
Downloads: 7
Average score: 0 (0 votes)
Metadata: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Other data

Secondary language: English
Secondary title: Court interpreting in Slovenia, Croatia and the United Kindom
Secondary abstract: Court interpreting is a form of interpreting and translating that requires an interpreter or translator with excellent qualifications in both the legal and linguistic fields. The requirement to provide an interpreter in court proceedings, especially criminal proceedings, to ensure a fair trial has historically become a part of several international documents, e.g., the European Convention on Human Rights and Directive 2010/64/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 2010. The field of court interpreting is regulated differently in each country. In our research, we focused on Slovenia, Croatia, and the United Kingdom, finding that the similarities and differences are largely determined by the legal tradition to which the country belongs. We summarized the characteristics of each system and made a few recommendations.
Secondary keywords: master theses;court interpreter;court interpreting;status;Prevajanje in tolmačenje;Prevajalci;Zakonodaja;Slovenija;Hrvaška;Velika Britanija;Univerzitetna in visokošolska dela;
Type (COBISS): Master's thesis/paper
Thesis comment: Univ. v Mariboru, Filozofska fak., Oddelek za prevodoslovje
Pages: 1 spletni vir (1 datoteka PDF (X, 76 str.))
ID: 24482328