(magistrsko diplomsko delo)
Katarina Tomc (Avtor), Aleš Galič (Mentor)

Povzetek

V magistrski nalogi opisujem ureditev prekluzij glede navajanja novih dejstev in dokazov v pravdnem postopku. Zakonodajalec je v Zakon o pravdnem postopku vnesel pravila o omejevanju dokazovanja z namenom povečanja učinkovitosti sodnega varstva in za zagotovitev ekonomičnosti in pospešitve postopka. Stranke in sodišče se morajo z ustrezno skrbnostjo pravočasno pripraviti na glavno obravnavo. Stranke morajo procesno gradivo zbrati najkasneje na prvem naroku za glavno obravnavo, sodišče pa mora zadevo podrobno preučiti, da lahko stranke peko materialnega procesnega vodstva usmerja, da dopolnijo nepopolna dejstva in dokaze. Novela ZPP-E uvaja pripravljalni narok, ki je namenjen temu, da sodišče s strankami odprto razpravlja o različnih vidikih spora, kar omogoča, da je že pred prvim narokom za glavno obravnavo jasno, katera dejstva so med strankama sporna in katere dokaze je treba priskrbeti za njihovo dokazovanje. S tem, ko zakon omejuje pravico stranke do navajanja novih dejstev in dokazov, posega v njeno pravico do izjave v postopku. Sodišče mora zato skrbeti, da z ustrezno razlago nedoločnih pojmov krivde in zavlečenja postopka omogoči, da stranki ostane realna možnost, da se v postopku izjavi. Prekluzije imajo namreč izjemen značaj, kar zahteva, da sodišče pojem krivde razlaga dovolj mehko, saj je takšen poseg v pravico stranke do izjave dopusten le v kolikor stranki ni mogoče očitati neskrbnega ravnanja in v kolikor prispeva k pospešitvi postopka.

Ključne besede

pravdni postopek;prekluzija;dokazi;pogoj nekrivde;koncentracija;skrbnost;novejša sodna praksa;magistrske diplomske naloge;

Podatki

Jezik: Slovenski jezik
Leto izida:
Tipologija: 2.09 - Magistrsko delo
Organizacija: UL PF - Pravna fakulteta
Založnik: [K. Tomc]
UDK: 347.9(043.2)
COBISS: 15786833 Povezava se bo odprla v novem oknu
Št. ogledov: 3614
Št. prenosov: 1040
Ocena: 0 (0 glasov)
Metapodatki: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Ostali podatki

Sekundarni jezik: Angleški jezik
Sekundarni naslov: Preclusions regarding the submission of new facts and evidence in the recent case-law
Sekundarni povzetek: In my master's thesis, I describe the regulation of preclusion regarding the submission of new facts and evidence in a civil procedure. In the Code of Civil Procedure, the legislator introduced rules on restricting of providing evidence in order to increase the efficiency of judicial protection and to ensure the economic rationality and to speed up the procedure. The parties and the court shall prepare themselves for the hearing in due time and with due diligence. The parties must collect the procedural material at latest at the first hearing session, and the court have to examine the matter carefully, so it can direct the parties by material process guiding, so they can complete evidence if they have been incomplete. The amendment ZPP-E to the Code of Civil Procedure introduces a preparatory hearing designed to enable an open discussion between the court and the parties about various aspects of the dispute, which makes it clear which facts are controversial between the parties and which evidence is to be provided before the first hearing. The limitation of the right of providing new facts and evidence leads to limitation of the right to be heard. Therefore, the court has to ensure the proper interpretation of the indefinite terms of guilt and delay so that there is no violation of the right to be heard. The preclusions are of exceptional character, which requires that the court interprets the terms of guilt in a sufficiently soft manner, since such an interference with the party's right to be heard is admissible only insofar as the party cannot be accused of negligent conduct and only as long as it contributes to speeding up the procedure.
Sekundarne ključne besede: civil procedure;preclusion;evidence;terms of non-guilt;concentration;due diligence;recent case-law;
Vrsta dela (COBISS): Magistrsko delo/naloga
Študijski program: 0
Konec prepovedi (OpenAIRE): 1970-01-01
Komentar na gradivo: Univ. v Ljubljani, Pravna fak.
Strani: 39 f.
ID: 10909851