(magistrsko diplomsko delo)
Melvin Kapo (Avtor), Saša Zagorc (Mentor)

Povzetek

Institut načina izvršitve se je prek sodne prakse Ustavnega sodišča razvil v fleksibilen instrument varstva človekovih pravic, ki prebija tradicionalno pojmovanje položaja tega organa znotraj sistema delitve oblasti. Odločbe z določenim načinom izvršitve občasno a vztrajno odpirajo temeljna vprašanja o pomenu ustavne demokracije, delovanju sistema zavor in ravnovesij in dometu obvezujoče narave odločb Ustavnega sodišča. Magistrsko delo se v prvem delu ukvarja z načelom delitve oblasti v Republiki Sloveniji in v tem kontekstu obravnava položaj slovenskega Ustavnega sodišča. V drugem delu se osredotoča na vprašanje pravne narave instituta načina izvršitve, pri čemer posebno pozornost namenja razlikam med pravnimi učinki načina izvršitve in pravnimi učinki zakona. Dodatno sta v tem poglavju naslovljeni vprašanji učinkov načina izvršitve v tekočih sodnih postopkih in (ne)obstoja pravnih sredstev zoper način izvršitve. Različni načini izvršitve, ki jih Ustavno sodišče v svojih odločbah sprejema, povzročajo tudi različne pravne učinke v konkretnih primerih. Zato se magistrsko delo v zadnjem delu osredotoči na vprašanje in opis pojavnih oblik tega instituta, čemur sledi opredelitev pravnih učinkov vsake posamezne oblike.

Ključne besede

Ustavno sodišče;človekove pravice;način izvršitve odločbe ustavnega sodišča;pravni učinki načina izvršitve;pravna narava;načelo delitve oblasti;zakonodajna intervencija;magistrske diplomske naloge;

Podatki

Jezik: Slovenski jezik
Leto izida:
Tipologija: 2.09 - Magistrsko delo
Organizacija: UL PF - Pravna fakulteta
Založnik: [M. Kapo]
UDK: 342.565.2:347.9(043.2)
COBISS: 16978513 Povezava se bo odprla v novem oknu
Št. ogledov: 988
Št. prenosov: 254
Ocena: 0 (0 glasov)
Metapodatki: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Ostali podatki

Sekundarni jezik: Angleški jezik
Sekundarni naslov: Method of execution of the Constitutional Court’s decision.
Sekundarni povzetek: The Constitutional Court of Republic of Slovenia may in its decision specify who is to execute it and also determine the method of said execution. Such a power is vested to it in Article 40 of the Constitutional Court Act. In theory and in practice this instrument has been named as the “method of execution” of a Constitutional Court’s decision. Use of this instrument may present an intervention into the competence of the legislative branch. Through the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court this “instrument” has evolved into a flexible judicial tool that serves the protection of human rights. However, in a modern state, where separation of powers is a key principle, this instrument pierces through the traditional notion of the position of a Constitutional Court. Decisions which have been assigned a specific method of execution occasionally but persistently raise fundamental questions regarding the importance of constitutional democracy, the functioning of the system of checks and balances and the binding nature of the decisions of the Constitutional Court. The first part of the master's thesis deals with the principle of separation of powers in the Republic of Slovenia and in this context discusses the position of the Slovenian Constitutional Court. The second part focuses on the question of the legal nature of the above described instrument, paying particular attention to the differences between its legal effects and the effects of a standard legal provision. In addition, this chapter addresses the effects of an assigned method of execution in ongoing legal proceedings and the possible (non)existence of remedies against the assigned method of execution. Due to the fact, that assigned methods of execution differ greatly between the Constitutional Court’s decisions, so do the legal effects of these methods. Therefore, the thesis in its last part focuses on the question and description of the different forms of this instrument, followed by the description of the legal effects of each individual form.
Sekundarne ključne besede: Constitutional Court;Human rights;method of execution of the constitutional court's decision;legal effects;legal nature;principle of separation of powers;legislative intervention;
Vrsta dela (COBISS): Magistrsko delo/naloga
Študijski program: 0
Konec prepovedi (OpenAIRE): 1970-01-01
Komentar na gradivo: Univ. v Ljubljani, Pravna fak.
Strani: 52 f.
ID: 11237284