Petra Grošelj (Avtor), Lidija Zadnik Stirn (Avtor)

Povzetek

The paper discusses fuzzy group analytic hierarchy process. In the literature, there are found several approaches for determining weights either directly from the individual judgments or via group comparison matrix. However, the quality of the group weights was not studied yet. In the paper, we propose two new measures for the evaluation of the group weights that are adapted from classical analytic hierarchy process. We selected six approaches for deriving weights and use them in an application from the literature. We evaluated the gained weights. Our results show that the weights derived by the most popular extent analysis method are questionable in their reliability.

Ključne besede

decision-making models;fuzzy analytic hierarchy process;triangular fuzzy numbers;soft consensus;

Podatki

Jezik: Angleški jezik
Leto izida:
Tipologija: 1.01 - Izvirni znanstveni članek
Organizacija: UL BF - Biotehniška fakulteta
UDK: 519.8
COBISS: 5063590 Povezava se bo odprla v novem oknu
ISSN: 1246-0125
Št. ogledov: 550
Št. prenosov: 336
Ocena: 0 (0 glasov)
Metapodatki: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Ostali podatki

Sekundarni jezik: Slovenski jezik
Sekundarne ključne besede: odločitveni modeli;mehki analitični hierarhični procesi;trikotna mehka števila;mehki konsenzus;
Vrsta dela (COBISS): Članek v reviji
Konec prepovedi (OpenAIRE): 2019-08-16
Strani: str. 217-226
Letnik: ǂVol. ǂ27
Zvezek: ǂno. ǂS1
Čas izdaje: 2018
DOI: 10.1080/12460125.2018.1460160
ID: 11411868