Petra Grošelj (Avtor), Lidija Zadnik Stirn (Avtor), Nadir Ayrilmis (Avtor), Manja Kitek Kuzman (Avtor)

Povzetek

Group decision making is an important part of multiple criteria decision making and the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). The aim of this paper was to compare group AHP methods. Seven simple group AHP aggregation techniques that could be attractive for applications selected from the vast array of group AHP models proposed in the literature were selected for evaluation. We developed three new measures of evaluation: group Euclidean distance, group minimum violations, and distance between weights for the purpose of evaluation. The results of seven group AHP methods of the theoretical example were evaluated by three new evaluation measures, satisfactory index and fitting performance index. Furthermore, a case study of a decision making problem from the construction engineering field was performed and nine group AHP aggregation techniques, seven of them formerly presented and two new two stage group approaches were applied. Finally, the case study was evaluated using all five measures for each of the nine group decision making methods. The results showed that not all group AHP methods are equally convenient and that the selection of the method depended on the specific application.

Ključne besede

analitični hierarhični proces;lesene konstrukcije;večkriterijsko odločanje;

Podatki

Jezik: Angleški jezik
Leto izida:
Tipologija: 1.01 - Izvirni znanstveni članek
Organizacija: UL BF - Biotehniška fakulteta
UDK: 630*6
COBISS: 2293897 Povezava se bo odprla v novem oknu
ISSN: 0957-4174
Št. ogledov: 273
Št. prenosov: 147
Ocena: 0 (0 glasov)
Metapodatki: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Ostali podatki

Sekundarni jezik: Slovenski jezik
Sekundarne ključne besede: analitični hierarhični proces;lesene konstrukcije;večkriterijsko odločanje;
Vrsta dela (COBISS): Članek v reviji
Konec prepovedi (OpenAIRE): 2016-10-13
Strani: str. 2198-2204
Letnik: ǂVol. ǂ42
Zvezek: ǂno. ǂ4
Čas izdaje: 2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2014.09.060
ID: 12915392