Abstract
Although the EZ-DripLoss method has been performed in numerous studies, there is a deficiency in our knowledge of the EZ-DripLoss method’s suitability for poultry meat analysis. This study aimed to research the effect of different sample areas (10, 20, and 30 mm; n = 240), and fiber orientations (vertical vs. horizontal) on the EZ-DripLoss in chicken breast meat measured across a period of five days. The influence of sample area on the EZ-DripLoss of chicken breast meat with respect to the fiber orientation and across the five-day measurement interval was significant between 10 and 30 mm samples, and between 20 and 30 mm samples (p < 0.001). The estimated regression coefficient showed that EZ-DripLoss for the samples with horizontal and vertical fiber direction of 10 and 20 mm, significantly increased by 0.04% per hour, while for the samples with vertical fiber direction whose diameter was 30 mm, it significantly increased by 0.06% per hour, and for the horizontal fiber direction, it significantly increased by 0.07% per hour. The samples with vertical fiber orientation had 0.50% greater EZ-DripLoss compared to the samples with horizontal fiber orientation. EZ-DripLoss evaluation in chicken breast should be performed with a sample core diameter of 20 mm, a vertical fiber orientation, and over the course of longer measurement intervals.
Keywords
perutnina;piščančje meso;izcejanje;metode;plačila;
Data
Language: |
English |
Year of publishing: |
2021 |
Typology: |
1.01 - Original Scientific Article |
Organization: |
UL BF - Biotechnical Faculty |
UDC: |
636.5:637.5 |
COBISS: |
59205379
|
ISSN: |
2076-2615 |
Views: |
144 |
Downloads: |
49 |
Average score: |
0 (0 votes) |
Metadata: |
|
Other data
Secondary language: |
Slovenian |
Secondary keywords: |
perutnina;piščančje meso;izcejanje;metode;plačila; |
Type (COBISS): |
Article |
Pages: |
str. 1-7, e1095 |
Volume: |
ǂVol.ǂ11 |
Issue: |
ǂno. ǂ4 |
Chronology: |
2021 |
DOI: |
10.3390/ani11041095 |
ID: |
14641678 |